If doing it again, I’d probably go this route if the cone portion of the MCF901 is not too expensive and try to use the bearing from that as it would have more precise contact than what I actually did. What I am not sure of is if if the outer diameter of the bearing lines up with the updated DeWalt Output Cone Surface diameter to accept that bearing or if you would have to modify it. In terms of your anvil and housing output mating, I was told elsewhere that if you order the MCF901 Housing “Cone” and take the bearing from that and pop it into the DeWalt it should work, which makes sense. MAC TOOLS MCF901 Anvil is compatible with the Gear/Hammer assembly output in terms of the output shaft of the hammer working with the receptacle/female “bearing” on the anvil itself. For anyone in the future trying to accomplish this that does not want to use the aforementioned compromises, here is what I have learned / found out at this point:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |